ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2026
Cancer-related clinically important sleep disturbance in head and neck cancer survivors: longitudinal findings from the head and neck 5000 prospective clinical cohort.
Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSleep disturbance is a common issue among patients with head and neck cancer (HNC); it may exacerbate symptom burden and reduce quality of life. However, previous evidence on sleep disturbance trends and predictors is limited; many studies have been small and/or cross-sectional. Therefore, using data from a large, prospective, nationwide cohort, we investigated clinically important sleep disturbance during the first year following diagnosis and the factors associated with it.
methodsHead and Neck 5000 (HN5000) recruited HNC patients newly diagnosed in the UK during 2011-2014, with longitudinal follow-up at 4 months and 12 months post-recruitment. Sociodemographic and clinical data were collected via questionnaires and electronic medical records. Patients completed the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire at baseline (pre-treatment) and follow-up, from which sleep disturbance scores (ranging 0-100) were derived. Following past work, clinically important sleep disturbance was defined as a score of 50 or higher. Multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression was used to investigate time trends and identify associated clinical, sociodemographic and lifestyle factors.
resultsAt baseline, 861 of 2,867 (30.0%) non-recurrent HNC patients reported clinically important sleep disturbance; this proportion remained unchanged at 4 months (29.9%) but decreased at 12 months (23.3%). In the multivariable model, after adjusting for time-point, the odds of having clinically important sleep disturbance over 12 months were significantly increased among females, those living in the most deprived areas, those with comorbidities, those receiving chemoradiotherapy only, and current smokers. In addition, depression at baseline was strongly associated with increased odds of clinically significant sleep disturbance. Older patients (≥ 50) and current alcohol drinkers had lower odds of clinically significant sleep disturbance.
conclusionsIn this longitudinal clinical cohort, we found a high prevalence of clinically important sleep disturbance over time, especially among patients with depression at baseline. These findings highlight the need for targeted interventions and support for HNC survivors, especially for subgroups at higher risk. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: For HNC patients, sleep disturbance should be screened for and managed from diagnosis through treatment and into survivorship.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42521952What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.