ArticleEcoHealth2026
COVID-19 and One Health Governance in Indonesia reveal challenges at the Wildlife Interface.
Article in EcoHealth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A lacuna of information exists on how to build a One Health system that integrates human, animal and environmental health for the early detection and prevention of emerging infectious diseases. This study aimed to identify and articulate perceptions of practitioners and government stakeholders regarding the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia within a One Health framework. Key findings highlight the ability of local governments to rally stakeholders and form a progressive evidence-based response. While civil society's role is often overlooked, with appropriate government facilitation, it can serve as an effective agent of change on the ground. By adopting a bottom-up approach, this study provides a unique contribution to policy development discourse in line with One Health. The findings also emphasize challenges in the capacity of national and subnational governments to organize multi-actor responses, as well as the role of civil society and civic institutions in policy implementation. Persistent vulnerabilities at the human-wildlife interface were also evident, especially in relation to trade in wildlife, wild meat consumption, and the domestic keeping of wildlife, which have been exacerbated by fragmented coordination and implementation. New policy instruments, such as digital zoonotic disease surveillance, integrated early warning systems, and social forestry present opportunities for mitigating risk. To better address Indonesia's health security concerns in the post-COVID context, there is a need to strengthen One Health integration, enhance participatory risk communication, and align environmental management with health preparedness to mitigate future spill-over risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42521919What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.