ArticleFunctional & integrative genomics2026
A single-cell cell-of-origin audit of the lncRNA RMST: bulk expression under-represents its broad neural expression and over-attributes a liver biomarker.
Article in Functional & integrative genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are widely nominated as biomarkers from bulk-tissue data, which cannot reveal which cell type carries a transcript or whether a disease change is cell-intrinsic or compositional. Using the lncRNA RMST, I show that bulk expression can misrepresent where a lncRNA resides in both directions, and that cell-of-origin attribution should precede biomarker claims. I combined GTEx with > 40 million single cells and nuclei from the CZ CELLxGENE Census. (i) Under-representation: at single-cell resolution RMST is most broadly detected in brain (17.2% of ~ 29 million cells; 35% of neurons, up to 74% of dopaminergic neurons), confirming its neural role, yet bulk brain expression is low (0.7 TPM) because RMST is broadly but lowly expressed and nuclear-enriched. (ii) Tissue-dependent peripheral carriers: across six non-brain tissues RMST-positive cells are 85.5% stromal/epithelial (hepatocyte 0.02%), and the dominant carrier switches by tissue (cardiac/vascular fibroblasts vs renal/pulmonary/hepatic epithelium); in heart, fibroblasts carry it (79-91% of positive cells), but a disease per-cell change is not robust (bootstrap CI spans zero; within-study flat-to-negative), so I report attribution, not direction. A broad control (KCNQ1OT1: 6.2 vs RMST 0.5 lineages/tissue) confirms RMST's restriction is gene-specific. (iii) Over-attribution: RMST is undetected in all 411,742 diseased-liver nuclei (NEAT1 and MALAT1: ~ 90% of the same nuclei) and near-absent across liver cells, so a reported liver biomarker - including my own prior report - is unattributable. Cell-of-origin attribution, which both rescues an under-counted neural transcript and retracts an over-counted liver biomarker, belongs in the standard workflow for lncRNA biomarkers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42521917What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.