Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42521880›Full record

ReviewInternational ophthalmology2026

Radiation retinopathy: a review.

Ali Khodor, Maria F Colorado-Zavala, Raul E Ruiz-Lozano, Manuel E Quiroga-Garza, Eugenia M Ramos-Dávila, Pachely Mendivil-Aguayo, Symon Ma, Amr Almobayed, Chima Orameh, Shilpa J Desai

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ali KhodorBascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-8752-919X
Maria F Colorado-ZavalaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5365-8461
Raul E Ruiz-LozanoDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Illinois Eye and Ear Infirmary, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7022-2395
Manuel E Quiroga-GarzaDepartment of Ophthalmology, BronxCare Health System, Bronx, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5237-240X
Eugenia M Ramos-DávilaWilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1105-2848
Pachely Mendivil-AguayoNew England Eye Center, Tufts University Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Symon MaDuke Eye Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Amr AlmobayedBascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-7500-0731
Chima OramehDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Illinois Eye and Ear Infirmary, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Shilpa J DesaiNew England Eye Center, Tufts University Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA. Shilpa.Desai1@tuftsmedicine.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRadiation retinopathy (RR) and radiation maculopathy (RM) are common, vision-threatening complications of ocular and periocular radiotherapy, particularly after treatment of uveal melanoma. They result from progressive occlusive microangiopathy leading to retinal ischemia, macular edema, and visual decline. With the increasing use of plaque brachytherapy and proton beam therapy, understanding their epidemiology, risk factors, and management is essential to improve outcomes.

resultsRR and RM arise from radiation-induced endothelial and pericyte injury causing blood-retinal barrier breakdown, ischemia, and neuronal loss. Risk is influenced by patient factors (diabetes, hypertension, chemotherapy), tumor characteristics (size, location), and radiation parameters (dose, isotope, fractionation). Advances in imaging, especially OCT and OCT angiography, permit early detection of subclinical edema and microvascular ischemia before funduscopic changes. Classification systems integrating fundus, angiographic, and OCT features provide standardized grading. Treatment remains challenging, though anti-VEGF agents (bevacizumab, ranibizumab, aflibercept) demonstrate the strongest evidence for reducing edema, stabilizing anatomy, and preserving vision; however, no treatment has demonstrated clear superiority, and outcomes are largely derived from non-comparative studies. Early and sustained therapy yields better outcomes, though recurrence is common. Emerging agents such as faricimab are under investigation.

conclusionsRR and RM remain major obstacles to long-term visual preservation after ocular radiotherapy. Multimodal imaging enables earlier diagnosis, while anti-VEGF therapy is the current standard of care. Clinicians should maintain vigilance in at-risk patients, initiate timely treatment, and use imaging biomarkers to guide follow-up. Future research should optimize treatment regimens and evaluate novel therapeutics to further improve visual outcomes.

Indexed as

BrachytherapyRadiation InjuriesRetinaRetinal DiseasesFluorescein AngiographyHumansMelanomaRisk FactorsTomography, Optical CoherenceUveal NeoplasmsAnti-VEGFOncologyRadiation retinopathyRetinaVascular injury

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.