SynthesisClinical oral investigations2026
Dental caries experience in Indigenous children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing worldwide disparities and time trends (1968-2024).
Synthesis in Clinical oral investigations, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo summarize the evidence on the global experience of dental caries among Indigenous children and adolescents worldwide using decayed, missing, and filled teeth indices for deciduous (dmft) and permanent (DMFT) dentitions. MATERIALS AND
methodsA systematic review of the PubMed, SciELO, Embase, and Scopus databases was conducted. The search included studies with primary data on dmft and DMFT in Indigenous populations worldwide published until February 9, 2026. The pooled means (95% CI) of dmft and DMFT were calculated using a random-effects meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression explored heterogeneity through sociodemographic, geographic and time variables.
resultsA total of 95 studies from 19 countries were included in the systematic review, 59 of which provided data for meta-analysis. The pooled mean for dmft was 3.75 (3.58-3.92) and for DMFT was 2.36 (2.18-2.55). Considerable heterogeneity was detected in pooled analyses for dmft and DMFT. Both indices were higher in studies from North America (dmft = 5.23 [4.61-5.86]; DMFT = 4.74 [2.28-7.20]) than in those from Oceania and Asia (dmft = 3.30 [3.11-3.50]; DMFT = 1.74 [1.57-1.91]). Multivariate meta-regression revealed that dmft increased as the percentage of female participants rose (β = 0.10, p-value = 0.030). Additionally, DMFT increased with increasing age (β = 0.40, p-value < 0.001) and decreased with increasing HDI (β=-3.13, p-value = 0.034). No statistically significant differences in caries experience were found across the study periods.
conclusionsFor nearly six decades, Indigenous children and adolescents worldwide have consistently experienced dental caries affecting approximately two to four teeth. Disparities in dental caries were observed across age, sex, and national human development levels. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The persistence of dental caries underscores the urgency of implementing effective preventive strategies that are culturally adapted to Indigenous contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.