ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026
Patient perspectives on sexual orientation and gender identity data collection in cancer care settings.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) data collection is considered an essential component of patient-centered cancer care. The objective of this study was to understand attitudes toward and understanding of SOGI data collection among patients receiving care at a comprehensive cancer center.
methodsSurveys assessing attitudes toward SOGI data collection and acceptability of the collection methods were sent to 250 patients 2 months after participating in a pilot trial of SOGI data collection from September through December 2023. We also conducted a comparison of the acceptability of two standardized approaches to SOGI demographic questions. We purposively oversampled sexual and gender minority (SGM) patients to compare survey responses between respondents who did and did not identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and/or queer/questioning (LGBTQ +).
resultsOf 91 survey respondents (response rate 36%), average age was 58 years, the majority were assigned female at birth (69%) and white (71%), and 24% identified as LGBTQ + . Overall, participants reported high levels of agreement on SOGI data collection importance and acceptability. Survey responses suggested LGBTQ + participants considered SOGI data collection more important to collect and more comfortable to answer than participants who did not identify as LGBTQ + . For both groups, results suggest more limited response choices may be more understandable and acceptable than more extensive response choices.
conclusionThere were generally positive attitudes toward SOGI data collection among patients undergoing cancer-related care, with greater acceptability among those who identified as LGBTQ + . Further efforts in patient education and refinement of acceptable SOGI questions may be necessary to improve universal understanding and acceptability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42521861What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.