ArticleApplied microbiology and biotechnology2026
Bacterial communities in domestic washing machines associated with user-perceived odours.
Article in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Washing machines are known to contain significant amounts of microorganisms with negative implications for laundry and machine hygiene. In particular, the formation of machine and laundry odour and the potential role that microorganisms might play are still far from being understood. Here, we used Oxford Nanopore-based sequencing of full-length 16S rRNA gene amplicons and quantitative PCR to qualitatively and quantitatively investigate the bacterial community composition of different parts (detergent drawer, door seal, sump) of machines categorized as odorous (n = 8) and non-odorous (n = 8) by their users. DNA was extracted from swab samples taken in a standardized manner from each machine. In total, full-length 16S rRNA gene sequences (~ 1.5 kb) were obtained from the investigated machines and assigned to 1492 distinct species. The observed community compositions corroborated previous investigations using shorter gene sequences for identification. For instance, odour-related Moraxella osloensis showed the highest relative abundance in door seal samples. However, only a few statistically significant differences were found in overall community composition (alpha- and beta-diversity) between odorous and non-odorous machines. To investigate whether odorous machines might contain a higher microbial load, bacterial DNA was quantified by qPCR. Odorous machines showed higher median bacterial DNA concentrations across compartments, but odour category had no significant effect on bacterial abundance in a mixed-effects analysis. In summary, odorous and non-odorous machines did not differ greatly in bacterial community composition. Differences in bacterial activity or subjective odour perception may be responsible for perceived odour. Hence, future studies should include metatranscriptomic analyses and larger sample sizes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.