ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026
Prospective multicenter validation of a clinical score model for muscular injury risk stratification during esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsA clinical score model has been developed to stratify the risk of muscular injury during esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). This study aimed to prospectively validate the model in a multicenter cohort.
methodsA multicenter prospective cohort analysis of esophageal ESD was conducted. Individual data on patients, lesions, and outcomes of ESD were utilized to validate the model for muscular injury risk stratification.
resultsA total of 704 patients with esophageal lesions treated by ESD across two hospitals were included in the study. Muscular injury occurred in 10.5% of low-risk and 61.5% of high-risk patients. The scoring system demonstrated good discriminatory performance, with an AUC of 0.761 (95% CI 0.713-0.809).
conclusionsThe clinical score model showed acceptable performance for muscular injury risk stratification during esophageal ESD and may support perioperative decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42521829What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.