Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42521796›Full record

ArticlePediatric research2026

Impact of rescuer rotation on metrics of neonatal chest compression: a simulation study.

Minjie Wang, Fangfang Tao, Xiaohong Xi, Xiaoying Gu, Wenyan Zhang, Jiang-Qin Liu, Georg M Schmölzer, Po-Yin Cheung, Ming Zhou

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Minjie WangShanghai Key Laboratory of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Shanghai Institute of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Neonatology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Fangfang TaoShanghai Key Laboratory of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Shanghai Institute of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Neonatology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Xiaohong XiShanghai Key Laboratory of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Shanghai Institute of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Neonatology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Xiaoying GuShanghai Key Laboratory of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Nursery, Shanghai Institute of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Gynecologic Oncology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Wenyan ZhangShanghai Key Laboratory of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Nursery, Shanghai Institute of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Gynecologic Oncology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Jiang-Qin LiuShanghai Key Laboratory of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Shanghai Institute of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Neonatology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Georg M SchmölzerDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Po-Yin CheungDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Ming ZhouShanghai Key Laboratory of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Shanghai Institute of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Neonatology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. minggyzhou@51mch.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPerinatal asphyxia may require chest compressions in newborns, where rescuer fatigue can rapidly degrade compression quality. While the latest guidelines suggest rotating compressors every 2-5 min to mitigate fatigue, the optimal interval to balance quality metrics like depth and the chest compression fraction (CCF) remains uncertain for neonates.

methodsIn a manikin simulation, 60 pairs of NICU staff were assigned to perform 3 min of coordinated compressions and ventilation under one of three protocols: no rotation, 2-min rotation, or 1-min rotation.

resultsOver the 3-min period, both compression depth and pumping effect declined significantly with time in the non-rotation group. In the 2-min rotation group, compression depth showed no significant change over time, but the pumping effect decreased significantly. Only the 1-min rotation group demonstrated statistically significant preservation of the pumping effect over time. No significant difference in CCF between the 1-min and 2-min rotation groups.

conclusionRotating rescuers every minute during neonatal chest compressions significantly preserves both compression depth and pumping effect throughout resuscitation, without compromising overall compression quality. IMPACT: Rotating rescuers every minute during neonatal chest compressions effectively maintains both compression depth and rate, thereby preserving the vital pumping effect throughout resuscitation. Compared with a 2-min rotation interval, a 1-min rotation interval does not reduce overall chest compression fraction, further suggesting that frequent rotation does not compromise compression quality. These provide novel evidence for optimizing neonatal resuscitation protocols and offer a practical strategy for improving resuscitation quality in resource-limited settings. Our findings are consistent with prior studies underscoring the importance of frequent rescuer rotation in sustaining perfusion quality and mitigating fatigue.

Identifiers

PMID42521796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.