ArticlePediatric research2026
Comparable lung injury with and without distal perfusion during aortic arch procedure in piglets.
Article in Pediatric research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe reduction of pulmonary impairment due to complex aortic arch procedures in neonates and infants requires the most protective perfusion strategy during surgical intervention. We compared the selective anterograde cerebral perfusion (SACP) and SACP plus distal perfusion (SACP + DP) with moderate hypothermia in a piglet model with a focus on lung injury.
methodsSuckling piglets (2.5-10 kg) were randomized to undergo cross clamp for 60 min with either SACP (n = 9) or SACP + DP (n = 9) followed by 120 min of recovery. Lung tissue biopsies were analyzed for histological changes and the induction of hypoxia-related and pro-apoptotic factors.
resultsDifferences in body perfusion were proven by increased blood lactate levels (p = 0.01) and decreased oxygen saturation (p = 0.01) with SACP group compared to SACP + DP. The numbers of alveolar macrophages and type II pneumocytes (p = 0.39) as well as neutrophil profiles per area (p = 0.33) were similar in the SACP and SACP + DP group after 120 min of recovery. Stereological parameters of blood-air barrier damage and edema development were not different between both groups. Oxidative stress and the mitochondrial release of the pro-apoptotic molecules were similar in the SACP and the SACP + DP group.
conclusionOur piglet study demonstrated a similar degree of lung injury in SACP and SACP + DP during aortic arch procedures. IMPACT STATEMENT: SACP and SACP + DP during aortic arch surgery lead to a similar degree of lung injury in a piglet model. This prospective randomized comparison including histopathological and stereological analyses provides an objective evaluation of lung injury with different perfusion strategies. Clinical decision making for an optimal perfusion strategy in pediatric patients could be supported by the results of this study.
Identifiers
42521793What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.