ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2026
Key Points of Endoscopic Minimally Invasive Surgery for Gynecomastia Based on Refined Anatomy: A Case Series.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
abstarct
backgroundTraditional surgical approaches for gynecomastia are associated with significant trauma and insufficient protection of anatomical structures. Currently, endoscopic glandular excision has emerged as the primary treatment modality. A refined anatomical approach for endoscopic minimally invasive surgery is proposed, with evaluation of postoperative complications and aesthetic outcomes.
methodsThis study is a single-center, single-arm prospective investigation that collected and analyzed clinical data from patients who underwent endoscopic mastectomy at The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, aiming to evaluate postoperative complications and patient recovery outcomes with an emphasis on the refined anatomical approach.
resultsA total of 786 patients were included. The mean operative time was 117.8 ± 20.0 minutes, and the mean discharge time was 3.0 ± 0.7 days. Major complications included hematoma (n = 4, 0.5%) and nipple-areolar complex ischemia (n = 54, 6.9%). Among these, 52 cases of nipple-areolar complex ischemia resolved during follow-up, while 2 case progressed to necrosis (0.3%). Nipple-areolar complex sensation scores were 8.5 ± 2.0 (unilateral) and 8.0 ± 1.8 (bilateral). All procedures were completed without conversion to open surgery or significant intraoperative bleeding.
conclusionEndoscopic glandular excision, through meticulous vascular and neural preservation, effectively restores the natural contour of the male chest while minimizing complications. This approach offers a safe and aesthetically favorable solution for gynecomastia patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.