ArticleScientific reports2026
Perception of oral hygiene during orthodontic treatment: an eye-tracking and cross-sectional study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to analyze visual perception of patients undergoing orthodontic treatment with multi-bracket appliances (MBA), and examine differences in oral hygiene perception among adolescents, their guardians, and dental students. The lay person group included 56 participants (28 adolescents and guardians), while the expert group consisted of 30 dentistry students. Both groups evaluated randomized intraoral frontal photographs of adolescents with MBA, taken with or without a plaque disclosing agent. Using eye-tracking methods, eye movements were recorded during the evaluation. Significant differences in visual path length and oral hygiene evaluation were found. The expert group evaluated oral hygiene most accurately, with parents being stricter and adolescents more lenient. The expert group's visual path was significantly shorter than the lay person group's. Use of a plaque disclosing agent improved the accuracy of oral hygiene evaluation (p < 0.001). A correlation was observed between oral hygiene behavior and evaluation. In conclusion, dental students provided the most accurate oral hygiene evaluations. Parents were stricter, and adolescents were more lenient. Among adolescents, longer brushing time was weakly associated with more accurate evaluations, and plaque disclosing agents enhanced evaluation accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.