ArticleScientific reports2026
Development of sustainable green geopolymer concrete incorporating sugarcane bagasse ash.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sugarcane bagasse ash (SCBA) is increasingly being considered as an alternative aluminosilicate source for geopolymer binders. however, limited studies have comprehensively evaluated the combined effects of high SCBA replacement levels, alkaline activator molarity, thermal performance, microstructural characteristics, and economic feasibility. Therefore, this study investigates the use of SCBA as a partial and near-complete replacement of the total binder in geopolymer concrete. Fifteen mixtures were prepared with SCBA replacement levels of 0, 25, 50, 75, and 95% at NaOH molarities of 12, 14, and 16 M. Fresh, mechanical, durability, thermal, and microstructural properties, along with cost analysis, were comprehensively evaluated. The mixture containing 25% SCBA and activated with 14 M NaOH showed the best overall performance, with a compressive strength of 30.13 MPa, a splitting tensile strength of 3.02 MPa, and a sorptivity of 2.449 × 10⁻³ g/cm·s⁰·⁵ at 28 days. After exposure to 200 °C, its compressive strength increased by 39.30%, before declining at higher temperatures. Mixtures with higher SCBA contents showed slower strength loss, suggesting improved thermal stability. SEM-EDX observations were consistent with these results, as the optimum mixture showed a dense geopolymeric matrix, while higher SCBA contents and elevated temperatures led to increased porosity and microcracking. The cost analysis also showed that production cost decreased considerably as the SCBA content increased. Overall, the results indicate that moderate SCBA replacement can provide a practical balance between mechanical performance, durability, thermal resistance, and cost, supporting the use of SCBA as a sustainable binder component in geopolymer concrete.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.