ArticleNature communications2026
Fungal diagnostics and antifungal drug access in Latin America and the Caribbean: an ESCMID EFISG multinational survey.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Candidemia in Colombia: Species Distribution and Antifungal Susceptibility Profiles of Yeast Bloodstream Isolates from a Six-Year Multicentre Surveillance Study.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Invasive fungal diseases (IFD) pose a major health challenge in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC), particularly in vulnerable populations. A cross-sectional, survey is distributed between April 2023 and May 2025 to institutions involved in IFD diagnosis or care across LAC. The questionnaire evaluates diagnostic tools, antifungal availability, and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). A total of 619 institutions from 23 countries across LAC participate. Candida spp. (92%) and Aspergillus spp. (54%) are most frequently reported as major fungal threats. Culture (90%) is widely available, whereas access to galactomannan (41%), β-D-glucan (29%), and molecular testing (23%) is considerably lower. Availability of antifungals, including liposomal amphotericin B (38%), echinocandins (51%), voriconazole (57%) or posaconazole (33%) is significantly higher in countries with GDP per capita >US$ 10,000, in transplant centres, and in institutions managing people living with HIV. Therapeutic drug monitoring is available in only 36% of centres. Major diagnostic and treatment gaps persist in low-income countries, particularly in access to tools for identifying endemic mycoses. Substantial disparities exist in IFD diagnostic and treatment capacity across LAC, primarily driven by national income and institutional complexity. Strengthening laboratory infrastructure, antifungal access, and integration of fungal disease management into public health systems is urgently needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.