ArticleInternational wound journal2026
Transforming Inpatient Venous Leg Ulcer Management Through Early Specialist Tissue Viability Intervention.
Article in International wound journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inpatient care for venous leg ulcers is often inconsistent, with delays in vascular assessment and compression therapy contributing to prolonged healing and fragmented treatment. This evaluation examined a front-door Tissue Viability Nurse-led service providing specialist assessment at hospital admission. A descriptive service improvement evaluation was conducted. From 2022, patients in the Assessment Ward admitted with leg wounds received Tissue Viability assessment within one working day, including Doppler-based vascular evaluation, wound bed preparation, peri-wound skin optimisation and early initiation of compression therapy. Compression bandaging became a core clinical skill for registered nurses, supported by a rationalised product formulary. This observational evaluation and qualitative review suggested that early specialist involvement supported the timely initiation of compression therapy, reduced variation in inpatient wound care and minimised duplicate referrals through clear Tissue Viability-led care plans. Staff confidence in applying compression was perceived to improve, collaboration with vascular, dermatology and community services strengthened and patients informally reported clearer information and greater continuity of care, supporting a timelier approach to care delivery. Positioning Tissue Viability expertise at the Assessment Ward appeared to support improvements in the consistency and safety of care processes in leg ulcer management. This front-door specialist model, rarely described in acute care literature, enhanced timeliness and coordination and provides a scalable approach to addressing international gaps in acute wound care pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.