Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42521328›Full record

ArticlePsychophysiology2026

The Brain Signature of Reward Processing During Cooperative Gaming.

Karl-Philipp Flösch, Tobias Flaisch, Marco Steinhauser, Harald T Schupp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Karl-Philipp FlöschDepartment of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6324-2491
Tobias FlaischDepartment of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Marco SteinhauserDepartment of Psychology, Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Eichstätt, Germany.
Harald T SchuppDepartment of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft EXC2117-422037984
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human cooperation depends on shared goals and dynamic role-taking, aligning individual actions with goal-related tasks. However, in everyday social interactions, cooperation is often intertwined with personal goals and motivations. In this study, 48 young, healthy participants played the dyadic Pacman Game that incorporated a personal gamble to reflect these social dynamics. Brain oscillations and event-related potentials differentiated between achieving a shared goal enhanced by personal rewards and reaching a shared goal without a personal reward. Specifically, personal rewards, which had to be inferred from social cues rather than explicit feedback, were linked to increased delta/theta power and sustained positive ERP potentials over fronto-central regions. Furthermore, we replicated findings of alpha/beta power decreases and enhanced P3-like positivities associated with cognitive and semantic processing demands of specific player roles. Our results highlight how neural measures obtained in experimental games shed light on the interplay between shared goals and personal motivations, offering a valuable framework to bridge insights from controlled paradigms to real-world social cooperation.

Indexed as

BrainCooperative BehaviorEvoked PotentialsRewardAdultElectroencephalographyFemaleGames, ExperimentalGoalsHumansMaleMotivationYoung Adultbrain oscillationscooperationERPexperimental gamehyperscanningreward

Identifiers

PMID42521328
PMCPMC13413252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.