ArticleBMJ open2026
Testing an integrated model of population mental health: study protocol for the epidemiological, two-arm Mannheim incidence and inception cohort study (MAKO).
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMonitoring of population mental health is now considered to play a vital role in health, risk factor and demographic surveillance systems across the globe. Adopting a public mental health perspective on monitoring and surveillance requires us to consider the entire spectrum of mental health, which broadly ranges from positive mental health and well-being to severe mental disorders, including at-risk populations. This population mental health approach has become the mainstay of public mental health provision in many European countries but there is a dearth of research on this issue in Germany in the past 20 years and fundamental conceptual and methodological issues remain to be addressed at both the national and international levels. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Mannheim incidence and inception cohort study is a recently established two-arm population-based incidence (arm 1) and inception cohort (arm 2) study in the catchment area of Mannheim, Germany. In the incidence-arm, case ascertainment of incident cases is carried out for the years of 2024 and 2025 based on clinical assessment via structured clinical interviews and retrospective case record evaluation. In the inception cohort arm, we recruit and follow an epidemiologically characterised population-based cohort of individuals (1) without symptoms (ie, stage 0), (2) meeting the criteria for non-specific psychological distress (ie, stage 1 a) or (3) a Clinical High At-Risk Mental State for severe mental disorder (ie, stage 1b) at baseline and up to four follow-up assessments every 6 months. Assessments include clinical interviews, self-report measures and ecological momentary assessment.Poisson regression will be conducted to quantify variation in incident rates by age, sex and migrant/ethnic minority group status. In the inception cohort arm, we will perform maximum likelihood estimation of hazard rates to estimate rates of transition from earlier stages to later stages. Latent class analysis will be used to identify empirically-based clinical stages to test convergence with contemporary staging models. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has received ethical approval from the local ethics committee (Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 585-21). Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals, presented at academic conferences and disseminated through (social) media to address a broader public audience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.