ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2026
Tree regeneration trends in forests of the northeastern USA and their implications for resilience and restoration.
Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Tree regeneration trends in forests of the northeastern USA and their implications for resilience and restoration.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tree regeneration is vital to shaping characteristics of future forests, including vulnerability to climate change; resilience to pests, pathogens and disturbance; and departure from historical species composition. We used data from nationwide forest inventory plots to investigate trends in sapling abundance and recruitment as well as tree density for common tree species from 2003 to 2023 across forests of the northeastern United States. Tree seedling composition was then examined using (1) predicted sapling recruitment based on seedling abundance and (2) abundance of small-sized seedlings (5-15 cm and 15-30 cm tall). We assessed forest vulnerability to climate change using projected future habitat suitability, resilience using species-level trait scores, and departure from historical composition based on early colonial land surveys, in all cases weighted by relative abundance of trees, saplings, and seedlings within forest inventory subplots. Sapling abundance and recruitment suggested improved climate change suitability relative to existing tree composition, yet also lowered resilience based on species trait scores. These seemingly contradictory results arise from declining sapling recruitment in northern tree species such as Abies balsamea and Betula papyrifera that are projected to fare poorly in future climates, yet persistently low sapling abundance of species that are more resilient to disturbances, pests, and pathogens, including Acer rubrum, Acer saccharum and Quercus species. Regeneration patterns suggested shifts away from historical species composition overall, although with considerable variability among genera. In contrast to saplings, composition of seedlings <30 cm tall indicated both decreased climate change vulnerability and greater resilience to various stressors and disturbance, suggesting that management targeted at survival and growth of already-established seedlings could help to shape more resilient forests in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.