SynthesisAsia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition2026
Does vitamin D supplementation modulate metabolic risk factors of cardiovascular disease? A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials.
Synthesis in Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesVitamin D has been proposed to influence several cardiometabolic risk factors; however, evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and recent meta-analyses remains inconsistent regarding the magnitude of these effects. This meta-analysis evaluated the effects of vitamin D supplementation on lipid profile, blood pressure, and glycaemic parameters, and explored whether age and baseline serum vitamin D concentrations modified these associations. METHODS AND STUDY
designA systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs was conducted to compare oral vitamin D supplementation with placebo in adults. PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched systematically. Risk of bias was as-sessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Pooled effect sizes with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using random-effects models.
resultsA total of 14,051 abstracts were identified, and 45 RCTs were included in the final analysis. Vitamin D supplementation significantly reduced low-density lipoprotein cho-lesterol (LDL-C) by 0.136 mmol/L (95% CI: -0.215, -0.056), systolic blood pressure (SBP) by 2.79 mm Hg (95% CI: -4.65, -0.94), fasting blood glucose (FBG) by 0.11 mmol/L (95% CI: -0.19, -0.04), and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) by 0.164% (95% CI: -0.32, -0.01) compared with placebo. Subgroup analyses showed reductions in SBP and LDL-C among participants aged ≥55 years, whereas FBG was reduced in those aged <55 years. While favorable effects on FBG and HbA1c were observed with a baseline blood level of vitamin D of less than 50 nmol/L.
conclusionsVitamin D supplementation may modestly improve selected cardiomet-abolic risk factors. Age and baseline vitamin D status may influence these effects, although their clinical sig-nificance remains uncertain. Further well-designed RCTs are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.