Trial reportMagnetic resonance in medicine2026
"Two-For-One": 4D Cardiac and Pulmonary MR Imaging From a Single Acquisition Using bSTAR.
Trial report in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03331380 (Technical Development of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Technical Development of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging (CMR) Using a Low Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) Scanner System
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo generate 4D (3D+time) images of both the heart and lungs using a single volumetric radial free-breathing bSSFP dual echo acquisition (bSTAR) with two image reconstructions within a single pipeline deployed inline at 0.55 and 1.5 T.
methods10 healthy volunteers and 12 patients with cardiomyopathy, lung diseases, or pulmonary hypertension were imaged at 0.55 T. Left-ventricular volumetry was compared to 2D cine images for the cardiac images. Image quality score was measured by two expert readers for cardiac and pulmonary bSTAR images.
resultsCardiac and pulmonary images were reconstructed inline in 18 min 28 s and 8 min 39 s respectively. Ejection Fraction measurements showed no significant difference (mean bias -0.39%, p > 0.05) between bSTAR and 2D cines. Experts scored whole heart bSTAR images fair-to-good (image quality score of 3.47 ± 0.58) and whole lung bSTAR images as good (image quality score of 3.94 ± 0.85).
conclusionThe ability to assess both cardiac and lung morphology and function in a single scan with parallel image reconstructions will facilitate the evaluation of the cardio-pulmonary interplay.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03331380.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.