Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42521031›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology2026

Factors Associated with Successful Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in the Diabetes Endothelial Keratoplasty Study.

Marianne O Price, Loretta B Szczotka-Flynn, Zachariah W Reed, Robin L Gal, Ari M Brandsdorfer, Michael D Greenwood, Mark A Greiner, Ula V Jurkunas, Ellen H Koo, Parag A Majmudar and 8 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05134480 (Diabetes Endothelial Keratoplasty Study), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05134480 nacompletednot on this map

Diabetes Endothelial Keratoplasty Study (DEKS): Impact of Diabetes on Corneal Transplant Success and Endothelial Cell Loss

TypeinterventionalSponsorCase Western Reserve UniversityRan2022 to 2025Enrolled1,097ConditionsCorneal Endothelial Decompensation, Fuchs' Endothelial DystrophyArmsDescemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Marianne O PriceCornea Research Foundation of America, Indianapolis, Indiana. Electronic address: mprice@cornea.org.
Loretta B Szczotka-FlynnDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Case Western Reserve University and University Hospitals Eye Institute, Cleveland, Ohio.
Zachariah W ReedJaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida.
Robin L GalJaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida.
Ari M BrandsdorferConsulting Ophthalmologists, Farmington, Connecticut.
Michael D GreenwoodVance Thompson Vision, West Fargo, North Dakota.
Mark A GreinerDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
Ula V JurkunasMassachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts.
Ellen H KooBascom Palmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
Parag A MajmudarChicago Cornea Consultants, Chicago, Illinois.
Paul M PhillipsSightline Laser Eye Center & Ophthalmic Associates, Wexford, Pennsylvania.
Francis W PricePrice Vision Group, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Divya SrikumaranWilmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland.
Peter B VeldmanDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
David D VerdierVerdier Eye Center, Grand Rapids, Michigan.
Roy W BeckJaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida.
Jonathan H LassDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Case Western Reserve University and University Hospitals Eye Institute, Cleveland, Ohio.
Diabetes Endothelial Keratoplasty Study Group

Funding

Diabetes Endothelial Keratoplasty Study: Impact of Diabetes on Corneal Transplant Success and Cell LossUG1EY030030 · NEI · JAEB CENTER FOR HEALTH RESEARCH, INC. · PI Robin L Gal · 2021 to 2026
$5.2M
Diabetes Endothelial Keratoplasty Study(DEKS): Impact of Diabetes on Corneal Transplant Success and Cell LossUG1EY030039 · NEI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI LASS, JONATHAN H, SZCZOTKA-FLYNN, LORETTA B · 2021 to 2025
$4.0M
NEI NIH HHS UG1 EY030030NEI NIH HHS UG1 EY030039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify donor, lenticule preparation, recipient, and operative factors associated with 1-year Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) success in the Diabetes Endothelial Keratoplasty Study (DEKS).

designThis prospective cohort study was a prespecified secondary analysis of the DEKS randomized, double-masked, multicenter clinical trial.

participantsIndividuals undergoing DMEK to treat corneal endothelial dysfunction at 28 clinical sites.

methodsRecipient eyes were randomized to receive a cornea from a donor without or with diabetes in a 2:1 ratio. Details about donor, tissue preparation, recipient, and operative factors were recorded prospectively. The study excluded eyes with a prior penetrating keratoplasty or glaucoma tube shunt. Graft failures were classified as follows. If the recipient stroma was cloudy in the first postoperative week and did not clear or required a regraft within 8 weeks, it was classified as "primary donor failure" in the absence of operative complications or as "early failure" associated with operative complications. If the recipient stroma cleared in the first postoperative week or cleared after being cloudy in the first postoperative week and later required a regraft or became cloudy without clearing for 90 days, it was classified as "late failure." Proportional hazards and logistic regression were used to estimate risk ratios.

main outcome measuresGraft success at 1 year.

resultsOf 1421 DMEK grafts, 1374 (97%) were clear at 1 year, 32 were classified as primary donor failures, 12 as early failures, and 3 as late failures. In multivariate analysis, the 78 cases (5.5%) with operative complications had a lower success rate (89%; hazard ratio for graft failure 4.01; 95% confidence interval, 1.86-8.63; P < 0.001). Three additional factors were associated with slightly higher graft success rates without reaching the defined statistical significance threshold of P < 0.01: baseline donor endothelial cell density ≥2500 versus <2500 cells/mm

conclusionsDescemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty was highly successful across a wide range of donor, recipient, and surgical technique variations. Not surprisingly, graft success was lower in cases with operative complications. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

trial registrationNCT05134480, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Indexed as

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplastyDescemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplastyDiabetesEndothelial cell densityFuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy

Identifiers

PMID42521031
PMCPMC13581286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.