ArticleSeminars in speech and language2026
Interprofessional Education with Graduate Students in Dietetics and Speech-Language Pathology: A Sequential-Explanatory Investigation.
Article in Seminars in speech and language, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Abstract: Interprofessional education (IPE) prepares students to engage in interprofessional collaborative practice (IPCP), which is essential for managing complex clinical conditions. This mixed methods study examined the impact of a dysphagia-focused IPE sequence involving pre-service speech-language pathologists (SLPs) and registered dietitians (RDs) on their perceptions of collaboration and understanding of professional roles. A total of 31 graduate students (23 SLP, 8 RD) participated in two case-based IPE sessions embedded within existing coursework. Quantitative data were collected using the Student Perceptions of Interprofessional Clinical Education-Revised (SPICE-R) while qualitative data were gathered through open-ended reflections and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. Results indicated statistically significant improvements on the SPICE-R alongside significant increase in participants' perceived understanding of SLP and RD roles in dysphagia management. Qualitative findings illustrated how these changes occurred, revealing shifts from generalized descriptions of collaboration to more specific understandings of roles, communication, and shared responsibility for patients. There was strong convergence between the quantitative and qualitative strands, with qualitative themes elaborating on the processes underlying improvements in students' perceptions of IPCP. These findings suggest targeted IPE experiences embedded within existing coursework can meaningfully influence trainees' perceived readiness for dysphagia care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.