ArticlePoultry science2026
Effects of Rosa roxburghii Tratt. pomace as a functional feed ingredient on the growth performance, antioxidant capacity, meat quality, and muscle chemical composition of broilers.
Article in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the effects of dietary supplementation with Rosa roxburghii Tratt. pomace (RRP) as a functional feed ingredient on growth performance, antioxidant capacity, meat quality, and muscle chemical composition in broilers, and to determine the optimal inclusion level through a dose-response approach. A total of 360 one-day-old Arbor Acres broilers were randomly assigned to four treatments with nine replicates of 10 birds each for 42 days: a control group (basal diet) and three groups supplemented with 50, 100, or 150 g/kg RRP, respectively. Results showed that RRP supplementation at 100 or 150 g/kg significantly increased final body weight, average daily gain, and average daily feed intake, while decreasing the feed-to-gain ratio compared with the control (P < 0.05). RRP dose-dependently enhanced superoxide dismutase, glutathione peroxidase, catalase, and total antioxidant capacity activities in both serum and breast muscle, and reduced malondialdehyde content (P < 0.05). Meat quality parameters, including pH, drip loss, shear force, and meat color, were not affected by RRP supplementation. RRP supplementation significantly increased crude protein content and decreased crude fat content in breast muscle (P < 0.05). Regarding detailed chemical composition, RRP supplementation increased total amino acids, total essential amino acids, and the contents of beneficial polyunsaturated fatty acids, while improving the PUFA/SFA ratio and reducing the ω-6/ω-3 ratio. For all significantly affected parameters, the 100 and 150 g/kg groups showed comparable effects, with no significant differences between them. Mortality rate was not affected by any treatment. In conclusion, dietary RRP supplementation at 100 g/kg is recommended as the practical and cost-effective inclusion level to improve growth performance, antioxidant capacity, and muscle nutritional value in broilers, without compromising meat quality. These findings provide a theoretical basis for the application of RRP as a functional feed ingredient, rather than a conventional trace-level additive, in broiler production and support the high-value utilization of agricultural by-products. The relatively high inclusion levels (5-15%) were deliberately chosen to establish a complete dose-response curve and identify both the minimum effective threshold and the safety plateau for this novel by-product.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.