Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42520088›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Early-warning signals for infectious diseases with a social-media compartment.

Francisca Olajide, Frithjof Lutscher, Stacey R Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Francisca OlajideDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Frithjof LutscherDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, and Department of Biology, The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Stacey R SmithDepartment of Mathematics and Faculty of Medicine, The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6529-3321

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early-warning signals (EWSs) are crucial tools for anticipating disease emergence and guiding public-health responses, but uncertainties in transmission and incomplete data can limit their reliability. Additionally, the performance of EWSs is rarely evaluated when disease emergence is delayed, and their use in the context of interactions between disease transmission and communication through social-media platforms has largely not been considered. We evaluate the relative performance of EWSs in predicting disease emergence under varying noise conditions and explore the use of EWSs with social-media dynamics to predict disease emergence. We develop a mechanistic model coupling infectious disease and social-media dynamics, introduce stochasticity and generate simulated time series. We detect changepoints, quantify delays relative to the bifurcation point and assess the performance of EWSs across different segments of the time series. The "reporting" infected compartment proves most reliable, and variance outperforms autocorrelation in high-noise scenarios. However, in the social-media compartment, variance and autocorrelation have weak predictive power. Our work provides a framework to advance understanding of how EWSs can be applied to forecasting disease emergence, contributing to improved disease preparedness and response.

Indexed as

Communicable DiseasesSocial MediaHumans

Identifiers

PMID42520088
PMCPMC13411938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.