Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42520075›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

The multisensory cocktail party problem in adults: The effects of the configural talking-face template and of facial, vocal, and linguistic identity cues on its solution.

David J Lewkowicz, Julia McClellan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

David J LewkowiczChild Study Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6685-3178
Julia McClellanChild Study Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0662-0358

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social communication often involves competing talkers and, thus, gives rise to the multisensory cocktail party problem (MCPP). To solve the MCPP, perceivers must bind, integrate, and segregate each talker's auditory (A) and visual (V) speech streams. Audiovisual (AV) temporal synchrony is a known and powerful multisensory segregation cue and facial and vocal identity cues are known to facilitate segregation. Using eye tracking, we investigated whether perceptual segregation of multiple talking faces depends on the configural talking-face template (Experiment 1) and whether facial, vocal, and linguistic identity cues associated with different talkers can facilitate perceptual segregation (Experiment 2). Results indicated (a) that AV synchrony-based perceptual segregation of multiple talking faces does not depend on the configural talking-face template, (b) that linguistic identity cues facilitated synchrony-based segregation of upright talking faces independently of facial and vocal identity cues, (c) that perceptual segregation was driven primarily by AV speech processing as evidenced by greater selective attention to the talkers' mouth, and (d) that, as evidenced by pupillary dilation, the type and number of AV congruence cues that had to be processed for successful segregation was associated with differential cognitive effort. Overall, these findings add to existing evidence indicating that adults' solution of the MCPP relies on AV temporal synchrony cues and on facial, vocal, and linguistic identity congruence cues but not on the canonical configural talking-face template.

Indexed as

CuesSpeech PerceptionAdultFaceFemaleHumansMaleVisual PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42520075
PMCPMC13411873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.