ArticlePloS one2026
GridCL for fine-grained load profiling in smart grids under limited labels.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fine-grained load profiling is important for demand response and energy management in smart grids, yet supervised approaches remain constrained by the scarcity of high-quality labeled datasets. To address this limitation, we propose GridCL, a self-supervised contrastive learning framework for low-label load profiling in smart grids. GridCL forms paired daily-load views using conservative input perturbations-small temporal rolling, multiplicative perturbation, and energy renormalization-and combines them with a temporal convolutional encoder to learn discriminative representations from unlabeled data. Experiments on three anonymized city datasets and one pooled benchmark show that GridCL achieves strong clustering quality on the pooled AllCities benchmark, reaching 0.648±0.115 ARI, 0.719±0.064 NMI, and 0.620±0.046 silhouette, while also attaining a best city-level ARI of 0.804±0.084. Under sparse-label evaluation, GridCL reaches 0.845±0.042 accuracy on the pooled benchmark with only 10% labeled users, and remains stable at 20% and 30% labeled users with accuracies of 0.851±0.033 and 0.849±0.034, respectively. These results indicate that GridCL provides an effective low-label solution for fine-grained load profiling in practical smart-grid settings.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.