ArticlePloS one2026
Very short-term production prediction for photovoltaic plants using Temporal Convolutional Networks.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Very short-term forecasting of solar photovoltaic energy production at national scale is challenging due to the high variability and spatial aggregation of generation across large territories. This paper evaluates Temporal Convolutional Networks (TCN) - a deep learning architecture based on causal and dilated convolutions - for nowcasting national-level solar production at one-hour and fifteen-minute horizons, using data from Spain sourced from the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity. Multivariate models augmented with past weather observations (solar irradiance and sun height) are compared against linear regression baselines. Results demonstrate that the multivariate TCN substantially outperforms linear regression at the one-hour horizon, and achieves consistent improvement at the fifteen-minute horizon. The relative contribution of architecture and weather features is resolution-dependent: at hourly granularity, the TCN architecture itself provides the dominant gain, while at the fifteen-minute scale the inclusion of weather covariates becomes the primary driver of accuracy, reflecting the greater atmospheric variability at finer temporal scales. A key finding is that past-only weather inputs are sufficient for accurate nowcasting, eliminating the need for future meteorological forecasts as model inputs. The results support the practical applicability of TCN-based models for national-level solar energy integration and provide a data-driven feature-selection criterion for similar renewable energy forecasting tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.