ArticleMedical physics2026
Accurate estimation of intravoxel incoherent motion parameters based on implicit neural representation.
Article in Medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIntravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) diffusion-weighted imaging has important value in treatment response monitoring. However, traditional voxel-wise independent fitting methods are highly sensitive to noise and do not utilize spatial correlation, resulting in unstable parameter estimation. Although existing deep learning methods have shown improvements, they are still limited by local receptive fields. PURPOSE: To address this, we propose a two-stage IVIM parameter estimation framework based on Implicit Neural Representation (IVIM-INR).
methodsOur IVIM-INR method achieves global spatial perception through coordinate encoding and enhances spatial context modeling by leveraging local 3D patch information from multi-b-value images. The first stage INR performs signal denoising, and the second stage INR accurately fits IVIM parameters.
resultsEvaluation on brain digital phantoms, AAPM breast IVIM-dMRI Challenge data, and clinical Glioblastoma (GBM) patient data demonstrates significant advantages of the proposed method over existing techniques. In brain simulation data, when SNR = 50, the normalized mean absolute errors (NMAEs) in tumor regions were 0.16
conclusionsBy combining INR's continuous function modeling capability with spatial-aware feature design, IVIM-INR overcomes the inherent limitations of traditional methods under noisy conditions, providing a more reliable tool for clinical IVIM quantitative analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.