ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2026
Better Healthcare Together: Co-Designing a Framework for Health Service Co-Design.
Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Better Healthcare Together: Co-Designing a Framework for Health Service Co-Design.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- Improving the Accessibility of Consumer Orientation: Co-Designing Infection Control Training for Consumers Partnering With Health Services.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCo-design in health services is increasingly recognised as essential for creating services and policies that address patient and community needs. However, genuine co-design can be challenging, with existing toolkits often catering to professionals, reinforcing power imbalances and limiting community leadership. This paper aims to present a novel co-design framework for health services and describe the co-design process taken in its development.
methodsThe co-design process involved a series of engagement activities (online forums, focus groups, discussions and workshops) with health consumers, health professionals and researchers within a metropolitan health service in Queensland, Australia. This process, co-led by a clinician researcher and health consumer, explored the implicit meaning of co-design and the barriers and enablers to co-design within the local setting, and the strategies required to support operationalisation of co-design. These data were combined with research literature, existing frameworks and lived experience to iteratively co-design the online framework.
resultsEight focus groups, forums and workshops across five hospitals and multiple community health services involved 128 individuals who contributed their professional and lived experience with co-design to inform the development of the co-design framework. The resultant 'Better Healthcare Together' framework includes three main components: (1) before you start co-design, (2) the co-design team and (3) the co-design process. A key feature of the framework is its deliberate focus on power, inclusion, equity, and bringing together diverse lived and professional experience to solve healthcare problems.
conclusionsThis co-design framework provides a flexible approach to consumer partnerships, with reflections on the process highlighting the relational nature, the need to avoid expert mindset and the evolving landscape of consumer engagement. While widely used, the framework alone may not build true health system co-design capability due to the need to address systemic and organisational barriers to co-design. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Members of the public contributed to this work across all stages of this project, including as project co-leads and co-researchers, members of the steering committee, workshop co-facilitators, and co-design participants. They are also co-authors on this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.