ReviewJournal of experimental orthopaedics2026
The three-pillar concept for functional knee positioning in robotic total knee arthroplasty.
Review in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has traditionally relied on standardised alignment targets, yet a relevant proportion of patients continue to report residual symptoms or dissatisfaction despite excellent implant survivorship. Growing recognition of inter-individual variability in knee phenotype, joint line orientation, ligament behaviour and patellofemoral anatomy has challenged the conventional 'one-size-fits-all' paradigm and promoted the development of more personalised strategies. This narrative review summarises the rationale for a more patient-specific approach to TKA and introduces the concept of functional knee positioning (FKPos) through a practical three-pillar framework integrating bone morphology, ligament behaviour and patellofemoral biomechanics. FKPos represents an evolution of functional alignment, moving beyond static coronal alignment towards an integrated, three-dimensional and patient-specific approach to implant positioning. FKPos is based on three interdependent domains, referred to as the three pillars: bone morphology, ligament behaviour and patellofemoral biomechanics. The bone pillar provides the anatomical foundation by restoring native joint line orientation and three-dimensional morphology within safe boundaries. The ligament pillar aims to achieve individualised, reproducible gap balance through implant positioning rather than systematic soft-tissue release. The patellofemoral pillar considers the anterior compartment as a dynamic and measurable component of knee function, with particular attention to trochlear anatomy, anterior offset and intraoperative tracking. CT-based robotic assistance enables accurate preoperative planning, intraoperative quantification of laxity, controlled adjustment of component position and dynamic assessment of patellofemoral tracking. These technological advances have improved the reproducibility of personalised TKA strategies and allow the three pillars to be assessed within a single operative workflow. Current evidence suggests that FKPos is feasible, safe and associated with satisfactory early clinical outcomes. However, clear superiority over other alignment strategies remains unproven, and long-term data are still required. The three-pillar concept provides a practical framework for patient-specific TKA by integrating bony anatomy, ligament balance and patellofemoral function. Its application should remain within defined safe zones and be interpreted as a functional positioning strategy rather than a universal target. Level of Evidence: Level V.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.