Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42519811›Full record

ReviewJournal of experimental orthopaedics2026

The three-pillar concept for functional knee positioning in robotic total knee arthroplasty.

Alberto Fogacci, Clément Favroul, Cécile Batailler, Elvire Servien, Sébastien Lustig

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alberto FogacciDepartment of Orthopaedics Surgery and Sports Medicine, FIFA Medical Center of Excellence, Croix-Rousse Hospital Hospices Civils de Lyon Lyon North University Hospital Lyon France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7336-037X
Clément FavroulDepartment of Orthopaedics Surgery and Sports Medicine, FIFA Medical Center of Excellence, Croix-Rousse Hospital Hospices Civils de Lyon Lyon North University Hospital Lyon France.
Cécile BataillerDepartment of Orthopaedics Surgery and Sports Medicine, FIFA Medical Center of Excellence, Croix-Rousse Hospital Hospices Civils de Lyon Lyon North University Hospital Lyon France.
Elvire ServienDepartment of Orthopaedics Surgery and Sports Medicine, FIFA Medical Center of Excellence, Croix-Rousse Hospital Hospices Civils de Lyon Lyon North University Hospital Lyon France.
Sébastien LustigDepartment of Orthopaedics Surgery and Sports Medicine, FIFA Medical Center of Excellence, Croix-Rousse Hospital Hospices Civils de Lyon Lyon North University Hospital Lyon France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has traditionally relied on standardised alignment targets, yet a relevant proportion of patients continue to report residual symptoms or dissatisfaction despite excellent implant survivorship. Growing recognition of inter-individual variability in knee phenotype, joint line orientation, ligament behaviour and patellofemoral anatomy has challenged the conventional 'one-size-fits-all' paradigm and promoted the development of more personalised strategies. This narrative review summarises the rationale for a more patient-specific approach to TKA and introduces the concept of functional knee positioning (FKPos) through a practical three-pillar framework integrating bone morphology, ligament behaviour and patellofemoral biomechanics. FKPos represents an evolution of functional alignment, moving beyond static coronal alignment towards an integrated, three-dimensional and patient-specific approach to implant positioning. FKPos is based on three interdependent domains, referred to as the three pillars: bone morphology, ligament behaviour and patellofemoral biomechanics. The bone pillar provides the anatomical foundation by restoring native joint line orientation and three-dimensional morphology within safe boundaries. The ligament pillar aims to achieve individualised, reproducible gap balance through implant positioning rather than systematic soft-tissue release. The patellofemoral pillar considers the anterior compartment as a dynamic and measurable component of knee function, with particular attention to trochlear anatomy, anterior offset and intraoperative tracking. CT-based robotic assistance enables accurate preoperative planning, intraoperative quantification of laxity, controlled adjustment of component position and dynamic assessment of patellofemoral tracking. These technological advances have improved the reproducibility of personalised TKA strategies and allow the three pillars to be assessed within a single operative workflow. Current evidence suggests that FKPos is feasible, safe and associated with satisfactory early clinical outcomes. However, clear superiority over other alignment strategies remains unproven, and long-term data are still required. The three-pillar concept provides a practical framework for patient-specific TKA by integrating bony anatomy, ligament balance and patellofemoral function. Its application should remain within defined safe zones and be interpreted as a functional positioning strategy rather than a universal target. Level of Evidence: Level V.

Indexed as

functional knee positioningknee phenotypepatellofemoral trackingsoft‐tissue balancetotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID42519811
PMCPMC13384342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.