ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2026
The top 100 most-cited publications on osteochondral lesions of the ankle: A bibliometric analysis.
Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The top 100 most-cited publications on osteochondral lesions of the ankle: A bibliometric analysis.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose was to identify the 100 most-cited scientific publications in ankle cartilage and provide an analysis of their main characteristics. Methods: The Web of Science (Clarivate) database was searched in April 2025 to obtain data and metrics on ankle cartilage research. The search list was sorted by the number of citations, and articles were included or excluded based on their relevance to ankle cartilage research. The information extracted for each article included the publication year, citation count, author's name, country of origin, journal name, article type, citation density and the level of evidence. Results: The 100 studies generated a total of 17,208 citations, with an average of 172 citations per article. The most-cited article was cited 489 times. The 100 studies included in this analysis were published between 1979 and 2018. In total, these articles represented 13 different countries of origin. The United States represented 38 of the 100 articles. The Netherlands, Italy and Germany followed with nine articles, and South Korea with seven articles. The most prevalent study designs were case series, and the most prevalent level of evidence was Level IV (69 studies). Conclusions: The present research concludes that the 100 most-cited publications in cartilage lesions of the ankle research were cited a total of 17,208 times. Case series and cohort studies were among the most frequently used study designs with an overall relatively low-level of evidence. The present work may function as a reference standard to help direct orthopaedic providers to the 100 most-cited studies in cartilage lesions of the ankle. Level of Evidence: N/A.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.