ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Prone position ventilation combined with high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy in patients with pulmonary infection: a retrospective study on evidence-based nursing practice.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pulmonary infections are a common and serious clinical condition, particularly affecting critically ill patients, and effective respiratory management is crucial for recovery. This study examined the clinical and nursing outcomes associated with prone position ventilation (PPV) combined with high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy in patients with pulmonary infection. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 200 patients with pulmonary infection admitted to two tertiary hospitals between January 2022 and January 2024. On the basis of the respiratory support actually received during hospitalization (non-randomized allocation), patients were assigned to an observation group ( Results: Over the first 72 h, the observation group showed greater improvements in PaO Conclusion: In this retrospective, non-randomized cohort, PPV combined with HFNC oxygen therapy was associated with better respiratory outcomes, fewer complications, shorter hospitalization and higher nurse-assessed comfort and compliance than conventional oxygen therapy. Because treatment allocation was not randomized, these associations cannot establish causality, and prospective randomized trials are needed to confirm the findings in larger cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.