ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
How do intensive care physicians wish to die? A cross-sectional study on end-of-life preferences and the role of palliative care.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Intensive care physicians are uniquely positioned to understand the benefits and burdens of life-prolonging treatments. This study aimed to examine the personal end-of-life preferences of intensive care physicians when facing a hypothetical incurable terminal illness and to evaluate the role of palliative care within these preferences. Materials and methods: In this descriptive cross-sectional study, a 17-item survey instrument (12 close-ended and 5 open-ended questions) was administered electronically to anesthesiology and reanimation specialists working in public and private hospitals in Istanbul. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, while qualitative responses were evaluated through thematic analysis. Content validity of the questionnaire was assessed using established content validity index methodology. Results: A total of 296 physicians participated (response rate: 28.8%). The mean age was 43.79 ± 7.54 years, and the mean duration of specialist practice was 12.34 ± 9.44 years. Refusal rates for aggressive life-prolonging interventions exceeded 70% across most modalities, with the highest refusal observed for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (88.5%). Only 0.7% of respondents indicated a preference to spend the end of life in a palliative care unit. Among physicians who had previously made end-of-life decisions for first-degree relatives, only 1.3% reported utilization of palliative care services. Discussion: Intensive care physicians strongly favor comfort-focused and palliative-oriented approaches for themselves at the end of life. However, the extremely low preference for palliative care units highlights a substantial gap between personal values and the current healthcare system. Strengthening palliative care integration, education, and policy frameworks is urgently needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.