Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42519767›Full record

ArticleFood chemistry: X2026

Comparison of rumen microbiota and meat metabolism in lambs under different feeding regimes: insights for optimizing growth performance and meat quality.

Yafeng Huang, Yuan Lu, Wuyunfeng Zhu, Fen Huang, Xin Luo, Kefan Zhang, Huiqing Wei, Yuxiang Sun, Guanjun Wang, Jiahong Chen and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food chemistry: X, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yafeng HuangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China.
Yuan LuCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China.
Wuyunfeng ZhuCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China.
Fen HuangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China.
Xin LuoCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China.
Kefan ZhangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China.
Huiqing WeiCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China.
Yuxiang SunCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China.
Guanjun WangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China.
Jiahong ChenCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China.
Zijun ZhangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated effects of three feeding systems - indoor feeding (CK), artificial pasture grazing for 4 h with indoor feeding (G4H), and 8 h with indoor feeding (G8H) - on lamb growth performance, meat quality, rumen microbiota, and muscle metabolites using 16S rRNA gene sequencing and untargeted metabolomics. Pasture-grazing groups produced meat with superior quality, particularly in fatty acid (FA) profiles than CK group, and G4H lambs exhibited higher average daily gain and meat crude protein (CP) content (

Indexed as

Huang-huai lambsMeat qualityMetabolomicsRumen microbiota

Identifiers

PMID42519767
PMCPMC13382122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.