Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42519757›Full record

ArticleFood chemistry: X2026

Comparative effects of high hydrostatic pressure versus thermal processing on quality attributes and volatile profiles in non-concentrated and concentrated tomato juice.

Xuehua Wang, Cuifang Liu, Ye Zheng, Shuyi Li, Xiaosong Hu, Zhenzhou Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food chemistry: X, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xuehua WangSchool of Modern Industry for Selenium Science and Engineering, National R&D Center for Se-Rich Agricultural Products Processing, Hubei Engineering Research Center for Deep Processing of Green Se-Rich Agricultural Products, Wuhan Polytechnic University, Wuhan 430023, PR China.
Cuifang LiuSchool of Modern Industry for Selenium Science and Engineering, National R&D Center for Se-Rich Agricultural Products Processing, Hubei Engineering Research Center for Deep Processing of Green Se-Rich Agricultural Products, Wuhan Polytechnic University, Wuhan 430023, PR China.
Ye ZhengSchool of Modern Industry for Selenium Science and Engineering, National R&D Center for Se-Rich Agricultural Products Processing, Hubei Engineering Research Center for Deep Processing of Green Se-Rich Agricultural Products, Wuhan Polytechnic University, Wuhan 430023, PR China.
Shuyi LiSchool of Food Science and Engineering, Wuhan Polytechnic University, Wuhan 430023, PR China.
Xiaosong HuCollege of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, National Engineering Research Centre for Fruits and Vegetables Processing, Key Laboratory for Food Non-thermal Processing, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, PR China.
Zhenzhou ZhuSchool of Modern Industry for Selenium Science and Engineering, National R&D Center for Se-Rich Agricultural Products Processing, Hubei Engineering Research Center for Deep Processing of Green Se-Rich Agricultural Products, Wuhan Polytechnic University, Wuhan 430023, PR China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High hydrostatic pressure (HHP) is a commercial non-thermal technology for fruit juice, but the interactive effects of prior evaporation concentration and subsequent HHP pasteurization on juice quality have not been systematically evaluated. In this study, the effects of HHP and thermal processing on quality attributes and volatile compounds of both non-concentrated and concentrated tomato juice were comprehensively investigated using HPLC, LC-MS, and GC-MS. The results demonstrated that thermal processing caused significantly greater degradation of color, all-trans-lutein, all-trans-β-carotene, and ascorbic acid than HHP in both juice types. By contrast, total lycopene, total phenols, and caffeic acid remained stable across all processing conditions. Furthermore, the concentration step significantly altered the volatile profile of tomato juice and exerted a cumulative effect on the changes induced by subsequent HHP or HTST treatment. Collectively, these findings confirm that HHP offers distinct advantages for lightly concentrated tomato juice, thereby providing a theoretical basis for its production.

Indexed as

Antioxidant componentsConcentrationHigh hydrostatic pressureTomato juiceVolatile profile

Identifiers

PMID42519757
PMCPMC13382043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.