ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2026
Benefits and risks of staff-owned dogs in small animal clinics: perspectives of employees that bring their dog to work.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many veterinary staff are dog owners, and the opportunity to bring their dog to work may influence their choice of workplace. This qualitative study assessed the benefits and risks for employees who bring their dogs to work in small animal clinics and aimed to develop guidelines to maximize benefits and minimize risks. The study explored the perspectives of employees at four small animal clinics in Switzerland who brought their own dogs to work. Semi-structured interviews were conducted using an interview guide informed by an ecological model encompassing individual, social, community, and societal aspects. In total, 29 interviews were conducted across various job roles and analyzed. Perceived benefits were consistent across the four clinics, whereas the associated risks varied according to organizational structures. Common benefits for the dog-owning staff included reduced stress, increased social interaction, and improved work-life balance. Identified risks included added stress due to care demands of the dog, additional cleaning demands, potential disease transmission, distractions, and organizational challenges related to spatial arrangements for staff-owned dogs. These findings informed the development of practical guidelines for managing staff-owned dogs in the workplace. Key recommendations include clear and consistent communication of rules, the provision of suitable spaces, and structured integration of dogs into the workplace. From a dog-owner perspective, the opportunity to bring dogs to work has the potential to be an important contributor to employee well-being in veterinary settings. The implementation of formalized guidelines may help to create a positive environment for staff, staff-owned dogs, and employers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.