Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42519707›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental research letters : ERL [Web site]2026

The perfect storm: human influence on the loss potential of Eunice-like cyclones.

Nicholas J Leach, Shirin Ermis, Aidan Brocklehurst, Dhirendra Kumar, Alexandros Georgios, Lukas Braun, Mark Dixon, Justin Murphy, Len Shaffrey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental research letters : ERL [Web site], 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. The perfect storm: human influence on the loss potential of Eunice-like cyclones.Environmental research letters : ERL [Web site] · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nicholas J LeachAtmospheric, Oceanic, and Planetary Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4470-1813
Shirin ErmisAtmospheric, Oceanic, and Planetary Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3402-2633
Aidan BrocklehurstAon Impact Forecasting, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2810-389X
Dhirendra KumarNational Centre for Atmospheric Science, Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2253-4129
Alexandros GeorgiosAon Impact Forecasting, London, United Kingdom.
Lukas BraunAon Impact Forecasting, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-4114-019X
Mark DixonCotality UK, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9452-278X
Justin MurphyCotality UK, London, United Kingdom.
Len ShaffreyNational Centre for Atmospheric Science, Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Storm Eunice was a severe windstorm that impacted Central Europe in February 2022. The meteorology and synoptic dynamics of Eunice have been studied in depth in several studies examining features of the storm such as its sting jet. The contribution of climate change to the storm dynamics and severity was examined in previous work, which found that in counterfactual weather forecasts-given an identical initial synoptic setup-climate change had measurably increased the severity of the storm. Here we move beyond meteorological attribution and quantify the role of climate change in the insured losses incurred during Eunice in, to the best of our knowledge, the first impact attribution of its kind for a European windstorm event. We combine the same counterfactual weather forecasts with three loss models, including two state-of-the-art commercial models, finding that the increases in meteorological severity do translate through to significant increases in estimated loss. We estimate a conditional increase in insured loss of nearly €2 bn between pre-industrial and present-day climates. Of particular note is the existence of several members within the forecast ensembles whose losses are far greater than what unfolded in reality. This includes one realisation, simulated in a warmer 'future' climate, in which the estimated loss could reach over 10x the realised loss during Eunice. The plausible existence of such a catastrophic loss is of considerable relevance to a wide variety of stakeholders across adaptation planning and the financial sector. We suggest that our results practically demonstrate not only the utility of counterfactual weather forecasts in quantifying impacts attributable to climate change, but also the value of academic-private partnerships in which the two sectors are able to bring different areas of expertise.

Indexed as

climate changeEuropean windstormsextreme weatherextreme weather attributionimpact attributioninsuranceweather forecasting

Identifiers

PMID42519707
PMCPMC13382149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.