ArticleJAMIA open2026
Sequential multi-site fine-tuning for incremental deployment of large language models for mobility functional status extraction.
Article in JAMIA open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: This study evaluated sequential multi-site fine-tuning of large language models (LLMs), simulating incremental deployment across institutions for extracting mobility functional status from unstructured clinical notes. Materials and Methods: We assembled a corpus of 600 clinical notes from 3 institutions, yielding 3810 annotated note sections (1200 training; 2610 testing). Building upon our previously established LLM mobility extraction pipeline, which utilized optimized prompt engineering, we applied parameter-efficient low-rank adaptation (LoRA) fine-tuning. We evaluated sequential multi-site fine-tuning, where the model is trained locally and only the updated LoRA weights are transferred to the next site. We compared this against joint fine-tuning, which requires pooling all multi-site patient data centrally before training. Performance was measured by micro F1-scores for 2 distinct subtasks: mobility extraction and impairment classification. Results: Sequential multi-site fine-tuning yielded comparable results to centralized joint fine-tuning for mobility extraction (F1, 0.861 vs 0.894) and impairment classification (F1, 0.912 vs 0.900). Both sequential and joint fine-tuning outperformed an untuned 70B model. Additionally, single-site LoRA models showed robust cross-site generalization. Discussion: Sequential multi-site fine-tuning offers a resource-friendly approach to adapt LLMs to clinical environments. By retaining previously acquired knowledge without severe interference, this strategy allows for local fine-tuning at each institution without the need to pool or share sensitive patient data required for joint fine-tuning. Conclusion: Sequential multi-site fine-tuning provides a viable solution for the scalable, incremental deployment of LLMs across institutions, showing promising generalizability for clinical information extraction from electronic health record narratives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.