Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42519584›Full record

ArticleHealth affairs scholar2026

A cross-national review of novel oncology approvals in the United States and China (2020-2025).

Grace Collins, Divita Pandita, Hillary Andrews, Bernat Navarro-Serer, Elena Levi-D'Ancona, Jeff Allen, Mark Stewart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health affairs scholar, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Grace CollinsFriends of Cancer Research, Washington, DC 20036, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4114-5938
Divita PanditaFriends of Cancer Research, Washington, DC 20036, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2018-4252
Hillary AndrewsFriends of Cancer Research, Washington, DC 20036, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0177-2024
Bernat Navarro-SererFriends of Cancer Research, Washington, DC 20036, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3001-4951
Elena Levi-D'AnconaFriends of Cancer Research, Washington, DC 20036, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4728-1976
Jeff AllenFriends of Cancer Research, Washington, DC 20036, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0586-3054
Mark StewartFriends of Cancer Research, Washington, DC 20036, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4847-0736

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The United States and China are among the largest hubs for oncology drug development and commercialization. We conducted a comprehensive characterization of how the 2 largest oncology drug markets are evolving relative to one another, with implications for regulators, sponsors, clinicians, and patients. Methods: Using publicly available drug databases from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA), we collected information on novel oncology approvals in the United States and China from 2020 to 2025. Results: From 2020 to 2025, the FDA approved 87 oncology drugs, whereas the NMPA approved 94; most (87% FDA and 65% NMPA) were approved through expedited mechanisms. From 2023 to 2025, the NMPA's approval volume increased and exceeded that of the FDA. Overall, the FDA reviewed drugs a median of 182 days faster, approved them a median of 164 days earlier, and had more global first-in-class approvals. Conclusion: As regulatory capacity expands globally, cross-national comparisons help identify approaches that are working well and inform continued innovation and regulatory modernization in the United States to ensure timely patient access to innovative oncology therapies.

Indexed as

expedited regulatory pathwaysNational Medical Products AdministrationOncology drug approvalsregulatory scienceU.S. Food and Drug Administration

Identifiers

PMID42519584
PMCPMC13383079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.