ArticlePublic health in practice (Oxford, England)2026
Co-designing water sanitation and hygiene (WASH) messages for a social and behaviour change campaign in Kiribati.
Article in Public health in practice (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To examine sanitation behaviours, barriers and motivators in South Tarawa, and to assess how formative research, message pretesting and co-design processes can generate culturally resonant Social and Behaviour Change (SBC) messages for WASH programming in Pacific Island contexts. Study design: Rapid Assessment and Response (RAR) mixed-methods study. Methods: Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 12 key informants and eight focus group discussions with community members (N = 73) across seven intervention villages. Co-design of message concepts and brand stimuli was integrated into focus groups, supported by quantitative ratings of message impact using a Smiley Face scale. Qualitative data were analysed using a hybrid Grounded Theory and Thematic Analysis approach, while quantitative differences across demographic groups were examined using ANOVA, t-tests, Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. Results: Four organising themes and 22 subthemes were identified. Key barriers included entrenched social norms supporting open defecation, overcrowding, limited and poorly maintained sanitation infrastructure, and safety concerns for women and vulnerable groups. Participants preferred empowering narratives delivered by trusted opinion leaders, while humorous brand concepts reduced stigma around sanitation topics. Quantitative ratings confirmed the Leaders narrative and Sit-Wipe-Flush brand as the strongest performers. Conclusions: Embedding co-design within formative SBC research produced culturally grounded insights into sanitation behaviour change in South Tarawa. Findings highlight the need for phased message rollout aligned with infrastructure availability and demonstrate the value of participatory design approaches to enhance relevance, ownership and long-term effectiveness of WASH SBC interventions in Pacific Island and other LMIC settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.