ArticleVeterinary and animal science2026
Disease control during livestock movement among smallholder farming actors in Kisumu West Sub-County, Kenya.
Article in Veterinary and animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Livestock movement remains a crucial socio-cultural practice for rural households in sub-Saharan Africa, yet disease-control practices during movement among sedentary smallholder farmers remain poorly understood. This study examined the relationship between livestock movement and disease-control strategies among smallholder farmers and other actors in Kisumu West Sub-County, western Kenya. Inspired by social practice theory and using a qualitative research design, data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 28 actors and two focus group discussions involving 16 participants, enabling data triangulation. The results reveal three distinct forms of livestock movement; intra-local, inter-local, and extra-local, each associated with specific disease-control challenges and responses. Farmers drew on locally available resources, community knowledge, and selective veterinary engagement to manage disease risks, often constrained by limited space, inadequate enforcement of health regulations, and economic pressure. Findings are context-specific and should be interpreted as qualitative insights from one sub-county rather than broadly generalisable evidence. The study offers implications for animal health governance in smallholder systems in developing countries like Kenya.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.