ArticleDementia & neuropsychologia2026
Validation of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) in older Argentine adults.
Article in Dementia & neuropsychologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emotional functioning plays a key role in well-being and healthy ageing. The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) is one of the most widely used tools to assess affective dimensions, but few studies have validated its psychometric properties in older adults in Argentina. Objective: To validate the factorial structure and psychometric properties of the PANAS in a sample of non-institutionalised older Argentine adults. Methods: A total of 206 participants aged 60-91 years completed the PANAS along with measures of emotional, psychological, and social well-being, life satisfaction, and depression. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed to test the bifactorial structure of positive affect (PA) and negative affect (NA), and reliability was assessed using Cronbach's α and McDonald's ω. Results: The two-factor model showed excellent fit to the data (Comparative Fit Index=0.98; Root Mean Square Error of Approximation=0.06), supporting the distinction between PA and NA. Internal consistency was high for both dimensions (α and ω>0.80). As expected, PA correlated positively with emotional and personal well-being and life satisfaction, whereas NA correlated negatively with these variables and positively with depressive symptoms. Conclusion: The findings confirm the validity and reliability of the PANAS in older Argentine adults. This instrument demonstrates a robust bidimensional structure and consistent associations with relevant psychological constructs, supporting its use for assessing affective dimensions in research and clinical contexts involving ageing populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.