ArticleRespiratory medicine case reports2026
Tezepelumab in severe asthma with pulmonary mucus plugs and eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis after dupilumab intolerance and suboptimal mepolizumab response: A case report.
Article in Respiratory medicine case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Tezepelumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of severe asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. However, real-world evidence remains limited, particularly for patients with eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis (ECRS) who exhibit inadequate or unfavorable responses to other biologics. Case presentation: We report the case of a woman with severe asthma complicated by ECRS, who exhibited divergent clinical responses to multiple biologic agents. Treatment with dupilumab initially improved both asthma and sinonasal symptoms, but was discontinued because of persistent marked peripheral eosinophilia and the development of pulmonary ground-glass opacities. Subsequent therapy with mepolizumab led to improvement in eosinophilia and partial resolution of radiologic abnormalities; however, asthma control deteriorated, and chest computed tomography revealed atelectasis and mucus plugs, accompanied by worsening of ECRS. Tezepelumab was subsequently introduced, resulting in marked improvement in asthma control, resolution of pulmonary mucus plugs, and improvement in sinonasal symptoms and radiologic findings. Conclusion: This case highlights the heterogeneous therapeutic responses to biologics targeting different inflammatory pathways in patients with severe asthma and ECRS. Upstream inhibition of TSLP with tezepelumab provided comprehensive control of both pulmonary and sinonasal disease, indicating that tezepelumab may be an effective therapeutic option for selected patients with complex type 2 airway inflammation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.