ArticleAnnals of Ibadan postgraduate medicine2025
A NARRATIVE REVIEW OF SAMPLE SIZE ESTIMATION FOR QUANTITATIVE EPIDEMIOLOGICAL AND CLINICAL STUDY DESIGNS.
Article in Annals of Ibadan postgraduate medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Sample size estimation is a crucial step in conducting valid and reliable research. It is the most common question researchers ask biostatisticians, as these investigators often face the problem of estimating the correct sample size for their research. Aim: This article aims to discuss the methods of sample size estimation in quantitative epidemiological and clinical research, presenting key principles and commonly used techniques in a simplified manner. Discussion: Unlike the previously published reviews, this article presents simple, straightforward, and easy-to-understand sample size formulas as well as basic principles on sample size estimation of common study designs in epidemiological and clinical research. In addition, explanations were provided on different statistical theories and concepts, such as outcome variable, confidence level, power, and effect size, which are important considerations in estimating scientifically appropriate sample size. Conclusion: Based on the descriptions and simplified formulas in this article, researchers can easily estimate a sample size that aligns with their study design and outcome measures, enabling more robust and reliable estimates and ensuring that the findings can be generalised to the wider population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42519545PMC13383087What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.