ArticleFrontiers in physiology2026
IMU-based rotator cuff injury recognition with varying configurations and combinations.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Assessing functional movements is important for evaluating shoulder impairments, as these movements directly reflect patients' capacity to perform daily activities. Intelligent rotator cuff injury (RCI) recognition is beneficial for clinical management. Methods: This study aimed to develop accurate and cost-effective RCI recognition models by integrating machine learning (ML)/deep learning (DL) algorithms with upper limb kinematic data collected in functional movement, and to explore optimal motion task combinations and model configurations for clinical practice. A total of 102 participants were prospectively enrolled, comprising 51 patients diagnosed with RCI, 25 patients diagnosed with adhesive capsulitis and 26 healthy volunteers. Patients with adhesive capsulitis were included to assess model's ability to distinguish RCI from other shoulder disorders that present with similar function limitations. Each participant performed six functional movements simulating daily activities and two shoulder range of motion (ROM) tests. Upper limb kinematic data were collected by inertial measurement units (IMUs) and analyzed via eight classification models, including the proposed DL based RCI recognition model (RCIRNet) and seven conventional ML models (e.g., KNN, SVM, DT, RF, NB, AdaBoost, and XGBoost). Given the relatively small sample size, data augmentation was applied to mitigate overfitting and improve model generalization. Model performance was evaluated across single and combined motion tasks via Accuracy, Precision, Recall, F1-score, and AUC with its 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: Results demonstrated that shoulder frontal ROM test alone achieved the best performance with RCIRNet, yielding an Accuracy of 0.89, F1-score of 0.89, and AUC of 0.93 (95%CI, 0.88-0.98). Combining four tasks increased Recall to 1.0 with high level Accuracy, F1-score, and AUC. However, adding more movements (5-8 tasks) did not improve model performance. Among different model configurations, RCIRNet performed best, SVM demonstrated overall stability, and KNN excelled in Recall. Discussion: It is concluded that selecting discriminant movements is more critical for effective RCI recognition than simply increasing the quantity of movement tasks. The shoulder frontal ROM test combined with RCIRNet provides an optimal approach for accurate and efficient clinical screening and rehabilitation monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.