Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42519530›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026

Use of Smartphone Activity Data to Monitor and Identify Trends in Recovery After Breast Reduction Surgery.

Richard M Kwasnicki, Laurie M Tupper, Joshua Hon, Hasan Zaidi, Jack Graham, Jonathan A Dunne, Vimal J Gokani, Navid Jallali, Francis P Henry, Judith E Hunter and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Richard M KwasnickiFrom the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Laurie M TupperFrom the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Joshua HonDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Hasan ZaidiDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Jack GrahamDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Jonathan A DunneFrom the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Vimal J GokaniFrom the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Navid JallaliFrom the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Francis P HenryFrom the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Judith E HunterFrom the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Georgina J WilliamsFrom the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Elizabeth DexFrom the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Simon H WoodFrom the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Current methods for assessing outcomes after bilateral breast reduction (BBR) include traditional metrics (length of stay, morbidity, and mortality), and more recently, patient-reported outcome measures. These can be limited by subjectivity and poor granularity. Postoperative physical activity collected from patients' smartphones has since been validated as an objective measure of recovery. This study aims to investigate recovery after BBR using this novel outcome measure. Methods: A single-center, retrospective cohort analysis was conducted of patients who had undergone BBR surgery at Imperial College NHS Healthcare Trust from August 2021 to February 2024. A smartphone application was used to retrospectively gather physical activity data from patients covering 1 month preoperatively to 6 months postoperatively. Data were analyzed to provide the time taken to return to 90% of preoperative activity levels, as well as daily activity patterns. Results: Fifty-six patients undergoing breast reduction were recruited. Postoperative recovery data were used to plot novel recovery curves, whereby the average return to baseline activity was 33.5 days. The only patient or surgical factor found to be a predictor of recovery was the weight of tissue removed, correlating negatively with activity levels in the first 2 weeks ( Conclusions: Activity data from patients' smartphones enhance our ability to investigate postoperative recovery with unique detail. Integration of these data alongside traditional measures could help to better inform patients and clinicians regarding recovery, outcomes, and funding decisions in this cohort.

Identifiers

PMID42519530
PMCPMC13384631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.