ArticleTrauma surgery & acute care open2026
Flagship response: a descriptive analysis of definitive surgical care at the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center following the Afghanistan withdrawal.
Article in Trauma surgery & acute care open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Military medical readiness cannot be created on demand: a 'Seaworthy' test of the Military Health System's flagship.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: We descriptively analyzed the trauma care outcomes of combat casualties arriving at the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center (WRNMMC) following the 2021 Afghanistan withdrawal as part of process improvement (PI) initiatives and quality assurance. Methods: A retrospective review of casualty records within the trauma registry at WRNMMC was conducted. The review included all patients who required definitive surgical intervention or critical care at WRNMMC from injuries sustained during the Afghanistan withdrawal. Data abstraction involved a detailed review of electronic medical records to document patient demographics, injury mechanisms, Injury Severity Scores (ISSs), operative reports, perioperative complications, and outcomes. Results: A total of 50 casualties were received at WRNMMC after the Afghanistan withdrawal, including 17 US military service members and 33 Afghan evacuees (20 adults and 13 pediatric). The mean ISS for US service members was 16.3±14.3. The mean ISS of Afghan evacuees was 10.7±6.1 for adults and 16.6±13.3 for pediatric evacuees. Polytrauma was common, with a majority of casualties sustaining injuries to multiple body regions. A total of 234 injuries were seen, with an average of 4.68±3.8 injuries per casualty. 264 operations were performed, averaging 5.2±5.6 per casualty. 23 postsurgical complications occurred in 10 casualties. 28 PI filters were initiated on 22 casualties. Caring for the casualties required multidisciplinary cooperation led by the trauma and acute care surgery service. Conclusion: The trauma care provided at WRNMMC following the Afghanistan withdrawal demonstrated institutional readiness and effective multidisciplinary coordination, but with a sizable burden of postoperative complications and PI filters. Lessons from this experience highlight the importance of continuous PI to optimize care delivery and outcomes, and underscore the need to sustain WRNMMC and strengthen other casualty-receiving Military Treatment Facilities to preserve trauma care readiness for future conflict. Level of evidence: Therapeutic/care management; level V.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.