ArticleInternational journal of women's health2026
Network-Based Identification of Core Acupoints for Primary Dysmenorrhea: A Synthesis of Randomized Trial Prescriptions.
Article in International journal of women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Primary dysmenorrhea is one of the most common gynecological conditions affecting women worldwide and a major indication for acupuncture treatment. Although numerous randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews have demonstrated the clinical effectiveness of acupuncture for primary dysmenorrhea, limited attention has been paid to how acupoint prescriptions are structured and which acupoints consistently play central roles across studies. In this paper, we present a network-based synthesis of acupoint prescription data extracted from 116 randomized controlled trials identified from three systematic reviews (2014-2024). These reviews were selected through a systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, specifically filtering for studies that provided granular acupoint prescriptions for primary dysmenorrhea to ensure data quality for network analysis. Using multiple network analytical approaches, including centrality measures, influence maximization, community detection, and structural role analysis, we identify a set of acupoints, CV4, CV6, SP8, ST36, and BL32, as core acupoints, with SP6 functioning as a central hub linking multiple functional clusters. This finding suggests that, despite substantial heterogeneity in individual acupuncture prescriptions, treatment for PD consistently converges on a relatively stable and structurally influential set of acupoints over time. We argue that network-based synthesis of existing trial data can complement conventional evidence by clarifying core treatment structures and reducing unwarranted variability in clinical practice. Because structural centrality does not inherently guarantee therapeutic superiority, future studies should integrate symptom severity, trial quality, and patient-level outcomes with structural analyses to better translate these network-based insights into standardized clinical guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.