ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026
From co-creation to technical bias detection methods: an interdisciplinary showcase from the BIAS project.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From co-creation to technical bias detection methods: an interdisciplinary showcase from the BIAS project.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Societal stereotypes are often reflected in, and can be reinforced by, machine learning models and linguistic resources such as word embeddings. While various benchmarks and bias detection methods have been proposed, most focus exclusively on English. When applied to other languages, these approaches typically rely on direct translations of English resources, overlooking language- and culture-specific nuances. In this paper, we introduce BIAS-WEAT and BIAS-SEAT, two novel metrics designed to detect biases in word embeddings and language models for Dutch, German, Icelandic, Italian, Norwegian and Turkish. Drawing on real-world biases identified through co-creation workshops with native speakers in the context of a hiring situation, we translated these insights into technical evaluation metrics that are applicable to general-purpose language resources. Our interdisciplinary study demonstrates how language models embed and reproduce biases that are specific to their linguistic and geographic contexts, underscoring the need for culturally grounded approaches to bias detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.