ArticleData in brief2026
Survey data on consumer responses to social media-endorsed FMCG advertising in Vietnam.
Article in Data in brief, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article presents a survey dataset on consumer responses to social media-endorsed advertising in Vietnam's fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) sector. Data were collected through a cross-sectional online survey administered in Google Forms and distributed via relevant Facebook groups in Vietnam between August and December 2025, using a non-probability purposive sampling approach targeting adult social media users with recent exposure to influencer-endorsed FMCG advertising. Of the 1003 submitted responses, 563 were retained in the refined analytical dataset after informed consent screening, five eligibility screening questions, and post-screening quality checks. The instrument includes 36 Likert-type indicators measuring nine reflective constructs (credibility, expertise, congruence, authenticity, entertainment, informativeness, customer experience, brand association, and engagement), together with demographic and control variables. Measurement quality was assessed in SmartPLS 4, with results indicating satisfactory reliability, convergent validity, and discriminant validity for the reflective measurement scales. The repository package contains the raw dataset, the refined analytical dataset, the codebook, the informed consent form, and the questionnaire in English and Vietnamese. These data can be reused for scale assessment, replication, multigroup comparison, mediation analysis, and comparative research on influencer-led advertising and brand-related outcomes in emerging markets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.